我爱我的祖国

【致美樟中】叮！这是一份樟中英语人的2024年度报告，请查收！_我的网站

临时天堂

一 | 叮！这是一份樟中英语人的2024年度报告请查收！ 2024年已然落幕，往昔岁月皆成序章，新岁序开，同赴新程。 Scott Ritter, a military analyst and former US Marine Corps intelligence officer, told Sputnik on Thursday that NATO’s policy of giving Ukraine billions of dollars in weapons that so quickly get destroyed is “inefficient and counterproductive” from both a political and a national security point of view.,“The more Europe invests its military capacity into Ukraine, the weaker Europe gets,” Ritter said.,Proxy Wars Are Expensive,“I think there's a couple of things at play here. One, and I think first and foremost, is that Europe has bankrupted its own military capacity by transferring military equipment to Ukraine in an unconstrained manner. It's becoming clear to all that Ukraine is facing a very difficult time on the battlefield. Weaponry is being provided by Europe, by the United States, by NATO, and this weaponry is not being absorbed in a coherent manner by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Instead, it's being received and rushed to the front where it is not being used effectively and increasingly it's being destroyed by the Russians. This is very expensive, very inefficient. It's detrimental not only to Ukraine's military capability but also the nations providing the equipment. They're literally stripping bare their own inventories to support Ukraine in a losing cause,” Ritter explained.,“The second part of this equation is, not only is this inefficient and counterproductive from a national security standpoint, but it's expensive and counterproductive from a political standpoint,” he said. “I think the political cost of supporting Ukraine is about to become very, very high.”,“Many political leaders in Europe now are going to be facing an increasingly hostile constituency, demanding answers as to why their leaders committed: a) economic suicide by joining in on a failed sanctions effort; b) are further bankrupting the nation by stripping bare their own arsenals, requiring them to expend money to restock. This is an expensive proposition. And c), supporting what is increasingly being documented as a very corrupt and, frankly speaking, vile regime in Kiev.”,Kiev’s Mask is Slipping,Ritter noted how Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky “is no longer seen as the savior” by Westerners. “More and more, he's being seen as what he has always been, an incompetent politician operating way above his capabilities.”,In particular, he recalled how a damning CBS documentary about the conflict was partially retracted earlier this month after it revealed that some 70% of equipment given to Ukraine never reaches the battlefield, either because the Russians destroy them or because they’re sold off on the black market. Forthcoming trials in Mariupol can also be expected to further peel back the Western myths about the Azov Regiment and other neo-Nazi units being anything but fascists.,© AP Photo / Alexander ZemlianichenkoRussian soldiers walk inside the Ukraine's Azov Regiment base adorned with the unit's emblems in Yuriivka resort settlement on the coast of Azov Sea not far from Mariupol, in territory under the government of the Donetsk People's Republic, eastern Ukraine, Wednesday, May 18, 2022Russian soldiers walk inside the Ukraine's Azov Regiment base adorned with the unit's emblems in Yuriivka resort settlement on the coast of Azov Sea not far from Mariupol, in territory under the government of the Donetsk People's Republic, eastern Ukraine, Wednesday, May 18, 2022© AP Photo / Alexander Zemlianichenko,“It's a horribly corrupt regime. It's also a regime that is being linked to an odious ideology, the old ideology of Stepan Bandera - a neo-Nazi, right wing, ultra-nationalistic ideology responsible for the murders of hundreds of thousands of people in the years of World War II and the decade afterwards, people who terrorized, murdered, raped ethnic Russians in the aftermath of the Maidan coup that took place in 2014,” Ritter noted.,“I think you're seeing Europeans starting to recoil from this and saying ‘This is not what we want to be seen as supporting.’ All of this, when you bring it together, explains why people aren't willing to continue to dispatch military equipment to Ukraine.”,Ritter dismissed the idea that Berlin and Paris could continue to send weapons to Kiev at the same pace that they have been. In this area, too, they will soon be eclipsed by Washington.,“Military equipment is not produced with the snap of a finger. And it requires a budgetary process. It requires careful coordination with the industrial base, and equipment is procured over the course of several years. What Europe has done by providing this equipment to Ukraine is in one fell swoop, in a matter of months, they've taken decades of military procurement and transferred it to Ukraine with no plan on how to replace it. You can't just simply pick up the phone and say, ‘give me a hundred more tanks,’ ‘give me a hundred more artillery pieces.’ It doesn't work that way. They have literally destroyed the very fabric of their national security by stripping bare their coverage with no means of replacing this. They've already bankrupted themselves. There's really not that much left they can give to Ukraine,” he explained.,‘This Can Only Be Resolved Politically’,Ritter said EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell is “out of his competency level” in commenting on military affairs, especially in making claims like “This war will be won on the battlefield.”,“You weren't going to see a general talking about that in that way,” he noted. “Fact is, most military people said that this can only be resolved politically, this being the conflict in Ukraine. Borrell is way off base. He's out of his competency level and he's just playing wrong. Who's going to solve this on the battlefield? What military in Europe today is capable of standing toe to toe with the Russian military in Ukraine and beating them? And the answer is none. There's nobody that can do this.”,Ritter said Germany and France, the two powerhouse NATO nations in continental Europe, are “paying a horrific economic price” and political price for their efforts to bring the US back firmly into the NATO fold, following four years of vacillation by former US President Donald Trump.,© AP Photo / BelTA, Andrei StasevichNormandy format talksNormandy format talks© AP Photo / BelTA, Andrei Stasevich,“[N]ow the United States has committed to NATO and has committed NATO to this horrendous mistake: that is the expansion into Ukraine, the confrontation with Russia, and this very expensive proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, that NATO is losing and losing decisively,” Ritter said. “But there's a lot of politics at play here. And it's not as a matter of just simply snapping your fingers and saying, ‘Okay, we've made a mistake, we're done, we're going to now reexamine a new European security framework.’”,Ritter recalled Berlin and Paris were also key guarantors of the Minsk Accords, which were supposed to settle the Donbass conflict in the context of autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions.,“It's not only that they failed to pressure Ukraine. It appears, according to [Petro] Poroshenko, the former president of Ukraine, that they were complicit in a scheme that used the Minsk Accords as a sham method to extend the negotiations, knowing they would never be finalized, to buy time so that NATO could train Ukrainian Armed Forces so that they would be in a position to be able to retake all of the Donbass and perhaps Crimea,” Ritter noted.,“Germany and France were part and parcel of this effort, so they need to be careful. They're very exposed here in terms of the politics of that. But reality is reality. And the reality is that the current European security framework, dominated as it is by American national security interests, is unsustainable for Europe,” he said. “They are paying a horrific economic price and they will probably pay a political price. Some of these leaders that are in power today won't be in power in the coming months as their citizens rise up through the democratic process and remove them for incompetence and for pursuing bad policies.”,“The last problem is Russia sort of owns the notion of European security framework having defined it, and their needs and their requirements in December of last year, through two draft treaties shared with NATO and the United States. For Germany and France to pursue a new European security framework would mean that they are stepping away from the United States and stepping toward Russia. That's very politically difficult to do, no matter how justified it might be.”,© Sputnik / Sergei AverinEight years of conflict have left a mark: it will take decades to demine the territory of the republics. Photo: A warning sign at a position near the line of contact with Ukrainian forces near Spartak village in the Donetsk region. Eight years of conflict have left a mark: it will take decades to demine the territory of the republics. Photo: A warning sign at a position near the line of contact with Ukrainian forces near Spartak village in the Donetsk region. © Sputnik / Sergei Averin,‘Somebody Else is Going to Have to Seek Peace for Them’,Ritter said that, like World War II after the Battle of Kursk, everyone knows that Ukraine has lost. The question is whether or not the government in Kiev is capable of making peace; he predicts not.,“It's going to be a victory in accordance with all of the prerequisites accomplished - demilitarization, de-Nazification and NATO removed from Ukraine. Russia has also now appeared to put some territorial requirements,” Ritter said.,“The key question is, how does this end at some point?” he asked. “There's going to be a need for a political collapse in Kiev, where the current cadre of warmongers and nationalists have to be removed. They will not seek peace. Somebody else is going to have to seek peace for them.”,“I think it's becoming clear that the current regime in Ukraine cannot be entrusted to govern in a responsible fashion, and I think Russia's taken it as part of their policy that they will protect ethnic Russians going forward, which means that they will probably acquire additional territory in Ukraine where ethnic Russians live. This takes time. It's not going to happen overnight. As much as Russia is winning the war, there's still a very strong Ukrainian military on the field that's receiving military assistance from the United States and NATO. So there's a lot of work left to be done.”。

二 | 回首2024这一载的教育征途，樟中英语团队满怀着热忱与执着，呈上这份闪耀着拼搏奋进之光的年度报告，诚邀您一同回顾我们携手走过的2024。回首瞻望2024，如果要用一种颜色来形容樟中英语人，那就是蓝色（Blue）。

三 | 蓝色象征冷静、智慧，B代表Breakthrough(突破)；L代表Lead（引领）；U代表Unity(团结)；E代表Excellence（卓越）、Empowerment(赋能)；意味着樟中英语人带着理性、睿智，凭借专业素养，深挖教育智慧，向着深蓝未知不断探索、前行，用教育力量为学生撑起一片蓝天。年度关键词1 一突破（Breakthrough）破茧成蝶，锐意革新在过去的一年里，英语科组教学、教研工作成果斐然，“突破”成为闪耀的年度印记。在备受瞩目的新教师品质课堂大赛中，连嘉娜老师以灵动活泼的教学方法、精妙绝伦的教学设计以及对学生的细致引导，赢得评委的高度认可，一举夺得一等奖；黄浩博老师凭借扎实的专业素养和沉稳大气的课堂风范，斩获二等奖的佳绩。他们用智慧和专业演绎一堂堂精彩纷呈的高品质课堂，不仅是个人专业成长的不断探索、持续突破；也书写了英语科组的辉煌篇章。教研领域佳绩频传，多项殊荣收入囊中。从理论探究的论文写作到实践应用的教学设计，从个人的专业竞技到团队的科研攻坚，均实现了重大突破，获奖率稳步攀升！年度关键词2 二引领（Lead）名师引领，助力成长 •邀请东莞市英语学科专家曾素文主任以《初中英语课堂PBL教学实践和应用》为主题开展专题讲座，为老师们拨开PBL的迷雾、指明方向，助力青年教师专业成长、华丽蜕变。 •樟木头初中英语兼职教研员李少娟老师组织兄弟学校共同研讨，聚焦期末复习备考，助力师生期末复习工作一路“披荆斩棘”。 •樟木头镇初中英语名师工作室主持人吴瑜老师勇挑重担，领衔冲锋在前，呈现一节精彩纷呈的示范课，充分发挥名师引领作用。 •英语科组长曾绮婷老师以《如何上好一节公开课》为题，总结新教师品质课堂比赛的亮点，鼓励青年教师钻研教学、教研，与教育新潮同频共振。

四 | 年度关键词3 三团结（Unity）众行致远，携手同行面对新教材的挑战，科组组建团队，共商共研，心往一处想、劲往一处使。在品质课堂初赛中，樟中英语人团结一心。参赛老师专注教学设计，听课老师认真记录，课后积极交流；评委老师不辞劳苦。

五 | 在磨课期间，各备课组团队齐心协力，贡献智慧；充分发挥青蓝工程的作用，资深教师毫无保留地倾囊相授，助力新手教师成长蜕变。这种团队协作的精神不仅促进新教师的快速成长，也营造温馨的教学研讨氛围，增进师徒间的深厚情谊，更是樟中英语人的传承见证。 ▲▼ 上下滑动查看更图片年度关键词4 四卓越（Excellence）载誉奋进，深耕不辍这一年，荣耀之花在奋斗枝头绚烂绽放，见证着我们每一步的坚守与成长。

六 | 七、八、九年级三个英语备课组凭借踏实的教学态度、出色的团队协作以及积极的探索精神，均荣获“优秀备课组”称号。

七 | 而英语科组更是齐心协力，共同攻克教学难题，凭借卓越的教学实力以及温馨、积极的团队氛围，成功蝉联“优秀科组”称号。

八 | 年度关键词5 五赋能（Empowerment）智启新程，拥抱未来 2024年是AI腾飞之年。樟中英语人紧跟时代浪潮，拥抱新兴教育技术。蔡思敏老师、连嘉娜老师、黄浩博老师巧妙运用AI技术，赋能课堂教学，创设真实课堂情境，充分点燃学生的学习兴趣。曾绮婷、王佳华、欧阳莉、罗文雅、严子柔老师运用AI技术打造多模态的教学方式，融入在教学设计创作中，为学生打造更加丰富、立体的学习体验。利用丰富多彩的学科活动让英语学习开启无限精彩可能。这五个年度关键词，解锁了樟中英语人奋进的精彩篇章。往昔已展千重锦，明朝更进百尺竿。回首过往，我们以汗水为墨，绘就青春华章；展望未来，樟中英语人将笃守初心，以如火的热情、创新的果敢，续写英语教育的璀璨诗篇。愿新的一年，继续与您携手同行，共赴星辰大海！文字：曾绮婷图片：英语科组初审：吴雪玲二审：刘　萍三审：陈开春。